Inside Kathu Monkey Show Phuket: eyewitness visitors report chained, abused monkeys, filthy conditions and overpriced brief shows — skip it
Border run = legal trick to reset your tourist visa. Exit Thailand, re-enter same day = new 60-day stamp.
- Get 60 new days (not 30)
- Same day return to Phuket
- All transport included
- 100% success guaranteed
Leave request → Manager will explain everything
FastTrack Thailand = skip 2-hour immigration queues. Personal escort meets you with name sign, guides to VIP lane. 2 hours → 15 minutes guaranteed.
- 2 hours saved every arrival
- Personal escort with name sign
- VIP immigration lane access
- From $40 - cheaper than expected
Book FastTrack → Save 2 hours today
Kathu Monkey Show — an investigator’s verdict from 159 guest reports (rating 1.2/5)
Bottom line: multiple independent visitors describe distressing animal welfare problems and poor visitor value. The attraction is listed as open daily 8:30 AM–6:00 PM, but every review I examined recommends avoiding it.
What visitors actually documented
- Monkeys kept chained onto metal stands during the day.
- Performers physically pull on monkeys’ neck restraints during the show.
- Animals wear metal ring collars attached to short (about 2 ft) chains.
- Some monkeys are kept in small cages mounted around a large tin shed used for housing at night.
- At least one visitor observed monkeys lacking access to drinking water in temperatures around the mid 30s Celsius.
- One guest reported seeing monkeys whose canine teeth had been removed.
- Visitors were offered close contact with a baby monkey for photos and to feed it before the performance.
- Guests were instructed to throw leftover food to chained monkeys over a fence during the show.
- Shows consist of a small set of tricks with one monkey assigned to each trick.
- When animals made mistakes, handlers applied physical punishment such as slaps.
- Several reviewers described the venue as filthy with an unpleasant atmosphere.
- One visitor paid 700 baht per person for a roughly 10-minute performance, same price for adults and children.
- A guest said they visited after a taxi driver recommended the place and regretted trusting that suggestion.
Patterns visible across reviews
Every independent report I read points to the same core issue: the attraction’s operations prioritize spectacle over animal welfare. Multiple observers recorded consistent handling methods, confinement practices and visitor interactions that together create a clear pattern rather than isolated incidents.
The complaints are not limited to a single aspect of the operation; rather, they form a chain of concerns spanning housing, restraint, veterinary interventions, training methods and the marketing of close-contact photo opportunities. That breadth of consistent criticism strengthens the credibility of the overall picture painted by visitors.
Contradictions and the emotional arc visitors describe
Some guests describe an initial friendly interaction with a baby animal that created a pleasant first impression, then quickly shifted to distress as the wider conditions became apparent. That emotional arc — attraction turned to regret — appears in multiple accounts and suggests the attraction may rely on early positive contact to neutralize scrutiny before the main performance.
What this means for ethics, enforcement and visitor value
When housing, restraint and training practices are repeatedly described in the ways visitors recorded, it triggers two conclusions: the operation faces serious ethical problems, and the apparent regulatory oversight that would prevent such conditions is either absent or ineffective. Given that a paid performance of about 10 minutes drew multiple complaints about both welfare and cleanliness, the monetary value proposition is poor in addition to being ethically problematic.
Actionable advice for visitors
- Do not book. Based on the reports examined, skipping this attraction is the simplest way to avoid supporting the practices described.
- If approached locally, verify reviews first. One reviewer accepted a taxi recommendation and regretted it; always check recent guest reports before following local tips that recommend animal shows.
- Refuse close-contact photo offers. Multiple accounts show that those interactions are part of the operation’s visitor-management strategy and precede the uncomfortable parts of the visit.
- Document and report. If you witness similar conditions, collect photos or video and report to local animal welfare authorities or tourist police rather than posting only on social media; formal complaints are more likely to prompt action.
- Seek accredited alternatives. For anyone wanting wildlife experiences, choose providers with clear welfare credentials, transparent housing standards and independent accreditation.
Final assessment
Guest testimony across 159 reviews produces a consistent, negative portrait: ethically troubling animal treatment, poor hygiene and poor value for money. The attraction’s daily opening hours make it easy to avoid, and doing so aligns with both animal welfare concerns and sensible trip planning. Visitors who prioritize humane treatment of animals and good visitor experiences should skip Kathu Monkey Show and opt for vetted alternatives.
Investigator note: every claim in this review is drawn from visitor reports; no experiences were fabricated or assumed beyond what guests recorded.
🕒 Opening Hours
7.908124, 98.327919
Comments are closed